http://oculture.disqus.com/NoneenThu, 02 May 2013 14:15:07 -0000http://www.openculture.com/2009/02/the_obama_hope_poster_the_new_copyright_controversy.html#comment-1029167942<p>The word "Hope," should have a red line drawn through it, and the work "NOPE"inscribed in letters twice as large. Obama has turned out to be a HUGE disappointment. 30 years ago he would have been considered a moderate Republican.</p>C. CorumThu, 02 May 2013 14:15:07 -0000http://www.openculture.com/2009/02/the_obama_hope_poster_the_new_copyright_controversy.html#comment-21002985<p>Good thought Joseba. I am with you on that.</p>Dan ColmanTue, 10 Feb 2009 18:18:15 -0000http://www.openculture.com/2009/02/the_obama_hope_poster_the_new_copyright_controversy.html#comment-21002986<p>They should donate the photo rights to some fair cause. The photo already belongs to the history so I don't care about who will make money with it</p>josebaTue, 10 Feb 2009 17:25:10 -0000http://www.openculture.com/2009/02/the_obama_hope_poster_the_new_copyright_controversy.html#comment-21002984<p>I'm more interested (actually I'm not, I know the answer :) why the title changed from PROGRESS to HOPE.</p><p>Please, someone think of the childr.. I mean the ethics in politics. :-D</p>listerTue, 10 Feb 2009 04:01:02 -0000