<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Open Culture - Latest Comments in The Historical Jesus on Your iPod</title><link>http://oculture.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://oculture.disqus.com/the_historical_jesus_on_your_ipod_75/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 22:05:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Historical Jesus on Your iPod</title><link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/02/the_historical_jesus_on_your_ipod.html#comment-1029168347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A truly illogical remark.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nadine</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 22:05:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Historical Jesus on Your iPod</title><link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/02/the_historical_jesus_on_your_ipod.html#comment-21002971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Seminar#Criticism_of_the_Jesus_Seminar" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Seminar#Criticism_of_the_Jesus_Seminar"&gt;Yawn&lt;/a&gt;.  Can you study Jesus as a historical figure without invoking at least an implicit theology?  (whether it be belief in or disbelief in)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>