<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Open Culture - Latest Comments in Philosophy for Beginners</title><link>http://oculture.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://oculture.disqus.com/philosophy_for_beginners/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:16:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Philosophy for Beginners</title><link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html#comment-1029168918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems very interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lupe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:16:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Philosophy for Beginners</title><link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html#comment-164950450</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've never had a formal education because I had cheated myself during my childhood.The knowledge I have hungered for is now reality because of "OPEN CULTURE" At 51 years old, I'm finally going to a community college and learning basics again. Sometimes I get overwhelm about the next coarse but I feel better when I will get help from "OPEN CULTURE".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Heredia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:59:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Philosophy for Beginners</title><link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/07/philosophy_for_beginners.html#comment-47371747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What knowledge do we have if we base our knowledge on sterility? Why read, why live for that matter and proclaim knowledge if it is based on 'just words'? So in other words to know is also very much more to NOT KNOW* which is why quite possible we have a brain that thinks objectively. &lt;br&gt;That quite possibly needs to be questioned generically if you will? Why submit to that which is already subject to? Here is if you like a paradox of either so called knowledge or actual knowledge which may or may not be connected to 'words' or proof of knowledge.   Thanks  Yvonne&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yvonne</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>