<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Open Culture - Latest Comments in Google Book Search: A Disaster for Scholars?</title><link>http://oculture.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://oculture.disqus.com/google_book_search_a_disaster_for_scholars/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:05:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Book Search: A Disaster for Scholars?</title><link>http://www.openculture.com/2009/09/google_book_search_a_disaster_for_scholars.html#comment-21003522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The professional critics are talking tosh - their basic complaint is that the first version of Google's archive is not absolutely, in every way, perfect.  This is ridiculous, especially given the problems with existing archives, for which see &lt;a href="http://idlethink.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/archive-iniquities/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://idlethink.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/archive-iniquities/"&gt;http://idlethink.wordpress....&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jonm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:05:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>