<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Open Culture - Latest Comments in Encyclopedia Britannica Now Free For Web Publishers</title><link>http://oculture.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://oculture.disqus.com/encyclopedia_britannica_now_free_for_web_publishers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:55:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Encyclopedia Britannica Now Free For Web Publishers</title><link>http://www.openculture.com/2008/04/encyclopedia_britannica_now_free_for_web_publishers.html#comment-21002500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;W007!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A (relatively) trustable source.  Good stuff!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Wesson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Encyclopedia Britannica Now Free For Web Publishers</title><link>http://www.openculture.com/2008/04/encyclopedia_britannica_now_free_for_web_publishers.html#comment-21002501</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck, but I'm afraid it's too little, too late. I probably wouldn't use Britannica if it was free now. Wikipedia is pretty awesome, and probably ten times the website that &lt;a href="http://britannica.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="britannica.com"&gt;britannica.com&lt;/a&gt; is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ben j</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>